Your brain: 0% interpersonal, 100% visual, 140% verbal, and 160% mathematical!

Congratulations on being 400% smart! Actually, on my test, everyone is. The above score breaks down what kind of thinking you most enjoy doing. A score above 100% means you use that kind of thinking more than average, and a score below 100% means you use it less. It says nothing about how good you are at any one, just how interested you are in each, relatively. A substantial difference in scores between two people means, conclusively, that they are different kinds of thinkers.
Matching Summary: Each of us has different tastes. Still, I offer the following advice, which I think is obvious:
- Don't date someone if your interpersonal percentages differ by more than 80%.
- Don't be friends with someone if your verbal percentages differ by more than 100%.
- Don't have sex with someone if their math percentage is over 200%.
| Link: The 4-Variable IQ Test written by chriscoyne on OkCupid Free Online Dating, home of the The Dating Persona Test View My Profile(chriscoyne) |
See, I told you. No social skills. Also, I'm 40% away from unfuckable. My people, they are suspicious of such statements.
no subject
Date: 2008-01-24 08:06 pm (UTC)Wanna go to a party this evening? I could use an extra friend/escort who was "safe". A lot of the people I would ordinarily invite are busy tonight and many other people I know wouldn't be willing to accept a "just friends" context.
no subject
Date: 2008-01-24 08:10 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-01-24 08:31 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-01-24 08:33 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-01-24 10:40 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-01-24 10:47 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-01-25 07:37 pm (UTC)Many of my friends, no problem. Unfortunately, these friends weren't available for this particular event.
Some of them, if I were to ask them to attend a party with me, even with an "as a friend" disclaimer, either would think *I* had ulterior motives, or would feel encouraged to have ulterior motives of their own, neither of which I'm OK with right now.
If I were a bit more emotionally stable right now, not as much of an issue, but I just don't feel like dealing with some of that these days.
no subject
Date: 2008-01-24 09:17 pm (UTC)The first two evaluation criteria are comparative -- how much are you similar to this other person. The math one is about absolute value, which suggests there is something inherently unsexy about quantitative geeks. I suspect the quiz-makers of bias based on feelings of inadequacy ;)
no subject
Date: 2008-01-24 09:32 pm (UTC)Yep.
They're just jealous of my numerical tendencies ...
no subject
Date: 2008-01-24 10:34 pm (UTC)Good call.
no subject
Date: 2008-01-24 08:56 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-01-24 10:34 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-01-24 10:29 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-01-24 10:33 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-01-24 10:40 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-01-24 10:58 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-01-24 11:04 pm (UTC)This is is my brain...
Date: 2008-01-24 11:51 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-01-25 01:52 am (UTC)Are they too apt at multiplying? Does it show an recessive gene for Asperger's? Does it mean they hacked the test as the max Math score is 200?
I just don't get it.