Actually, it was showing how much pressure an elephant's foot put on the ground versus a high heel. Because the elephant foot is broader, it actually places less pressure than a woman's shoe would. Hence, women are more dangerous than elephants.
I chose a rhinoceros because I love rhinos. Whether they'd really be more dangerous I deemed irrelevant to their awesomeness, and I apologize for turning your legitimate question into a popularity contest.
In fact, I now want to see 300 simply because you said there were rhinos in it.
Qualification: All knowledge is worth having. But some knowledge is only worth a little, and certainly a lot less than other bits of knowledge. So one certainly expects there to be many things that people aren't terribly concerned about knowing.
Vaguely related to the "most dangerous" question: I know the "Big 5" when it comes to dangerous animals to try and kill on safari are (from a Kenyan safari guide):
Those are in no particular order. They are considered as dangerous as they are because they stand a very good chance of killing the hunter before the hunter can kill them, even when the hunter has a modern weapon appropriate for the game type. This is due to either difficulty in hitting a vital organ, speed, general bad-ass attitude, and/or a stubborn refusal to die on the part of the animal.
![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png){kind=small}
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
branchandroot
which is more dangerous
Date: 2007-03-13 06:58 pm (UTC)Re: which is more dangerous
Date: 2007-03-13 09:26 pm (UTC)Re: which is more dangerous
Date: 2007-03-13 09:28 pm (UTC)Re: which is more dangerous
Date: 2007-03-13 09:32 pm (UTC)Re: which is more dangerous
Date: 2007-03-13 10:56 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-03-13 07:01 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-03-13 09:24 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-03-13 07:04 pm (UTC)In fact, I now want to see 300 simply because you said there were rhinos in it.
no subject
Date: 2007-03-13 09:24 pm (UTC)Also, there is only one rhino in it, and only for a short time, but it was hellishly impressive for those few moments of raging glory.
no subject
Date: 2007-03-13 09:28 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-03-13 08:20 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-03-13 09:23 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-03-13 08:58 pm (UTC)All knowledge is worth having. But some knowledge is only worth a little, and certainly a lot less than other bits of knowledge. So one certainly expects there to be many things that people aren't terribly concerned about knowing.
no subject
Date: 2007-03-13 09:22 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-03-13 09:54 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-03-13 09:36 pm (UTC)- Lion
- Leopard
- Elephant
- Rhino
- Water Buffalo
Those are in no particular order. They are considered as dangerous as they are because they stand a very good chance of killing the hunter before the hunter can kill them, even when the hunter has a modern weapon appropriate for the game type. This is due to either difficulty in hitting a vital organ, speed, general bad-ass attitude, and/or a stubborn refusal to die on the part of the animal.
no subject
Date: 2007-03-13 10:50 pm (UTC)