featherynscale: Schmendrick the magician from The Last Unicorn (Default)
[personal profile] featherynscale
It's official. Per JJ, my co-worker, the following standards of counting apply:

1 of something is "one"
2 or 3 are "a couple"
4 or 5 are "several"
and more than 5 are "numerous".

Please implement as soon as possible.

Date: 2004-09-02 01:32 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] capriciouslass.livejournal.com
But we also need definitions for 'a few', 'many', and 'quite a few'...

Date: 2004-09-02 01:34 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] featherynscale.livejournal.com
We're working on that. We'll have the information out to you as soon as we're done testing it.

Standard American Drewisms

Date: 2004-09-02 01:40 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] agrnmn.livejournal.com
2 = couple
3 = few
4 = several
5 = many
5-10 = numerous
10+ = a lot

quite a ( ) = x2 e.g. "quite a few" = 6, "quite a lot" = 20+

Re: Standard American Drewisms

Date: 2004-09-02 01:47 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] teross50.livejournal.com
Let us not forget the maximums , such as

Boat Load
Belly Full
Going to infinity with
Humungus

Re: Standard American Drewisms

Date: 2004-09-02 02:02 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] capriciouslass.livejournal.com
There's also:

bunches
goat load
metric goat load (apparently larger than a goat load, but I'm not sure by how much)

Sorry, not my area...

Date: 2004-09-02 02:08 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] featherynscale.livejournal.com
Boatload, goatload, and metric goatload are all measures of volume - that's a different department :)

Re: Sorry, not my area...

Date: 2004-09-02 02:11 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] agrnmn.livejournal.com
I believe [profile] zylch may have defined these in the past...

Re: Standard American Drewisms

Date: 2004-09-02 02:47 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] fionnabhar.livejournal.com
How much is enough to choke a horse?

Re: Standard American Drewisms

Date: 2004-09-02 03:40 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] agrnmn.livejournal.com
More than a goat load less than whole hog.

see that's not how i measure it...

Date: 2004-09-02 03:02 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] kcwitch.livejournal.com
the ozark way is...
1 of something is "one"
2 is "a couple"
3 or 4 are "a few"
5 or 6 are "a bunch"
and over 6 are "a whole lot".

Re: see that's not how i measure it...

Date: 2004-09-02 03:21 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] malvito.livejournal.com
If Over 6 is "A Whole Lot" in the Ozarks, than whose terminology would classify Over 6 as "A Great Big Bucketload," "A Buttload," or , better,"A Whole F*#%in' Lot?"

Re: see that's not how i measure it...

Date: 2004-09-02 03:52 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] kcwitch.livejournal.com
don't know. we don't curse in the ozarks. LOL!!

Date: 2004-09-02 03:12 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] malvito.livejournal.com
Connie and I used to get into semantic arguements on this subject, since I am of the group for whom "a couple" means More Than One But Not Limited To Two (i.e "a couple" and "a few" are interchangeable unless we are talking about people who are romantically linked, though, in the case of my friends and loved ones, the two terms are still occasionally interchangeable), and she is very much of the opinion that "a couple" means Two And Only Two And There Is No Variation From That Strict Interpretation. Dammit.

I refuse to be bound by mere mortal numerical interpretation.

Profile

featherynscale: Schmendrick the magician from The Last Unicorn (Default)
featherynscale

November 2013

S M T W T F S
     12
3456789
10111213141516
1718192021 2223
24252627282930

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jan. 16th, 2026 06:38 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios