Obligatory meeting rambling
Nov. 7th, 2003 09:07 amNotes from Ritualists meeting last night: I think that you know you've lost your grip on things when you say things to a group of neo-pagans like, "Please excuse my use of the word 'priests' to denote a group that includes both priests and priestesses. The English language is constructed so that when a group consists of both genders, the speaker uses the masculine form of the plural to describe them. Actually, I'm going to do it anyway, so it really doesn't matter if you excuse it or not."
I really tried not to be cranky about things that came up in the meeting last night, but when you have a bunch of people running around using 'priestess' as a verb, it can be difficult. But I think I only had two tantrums, so that's a definite improvement over some of the meetings of the past. (The other one was about fire - specifically, the need to include fire as part of a 'fire festival' ritual.... This was received by someone, possibly
saffronhare with a friendly, "There you go, getting all orthodox on us again", so I think that people are overall not offended by these outbursts.)
I think being in the role of facilitator for the meetings is making me less confrontational, so that's probably good. On the other hand, the fact that I'm confrontational at all while in that role is perhaps giving added weight to my crankiness, as if it were somehow 'official' crankiness, which is, of course, not the case.
Bleh. It's a work in progress, this "being sweet" thing.
I really tried not to be cranky about things that came up in the meeting last night, but when you have a bunch of people running around using 'priestess' as a verb, it can be difficult. But I think I only had two tantrums, so that's a definite improvement over some of the meetings of the past. (The other one was about fire - specifically, the need to include fire as part of a 'fire festival' ritual.... This was received by someone, possibly
I think being in the role of facilitator for the meetings is making me less confrontational, so that's probably good. On the other hand, the fact that I'm confrontational at all while in that role is perhaps giving added weight to my crankiness, as if it were somehow 'official' crankiness, which is, of course, not the case.
Bleh. It's a work in progress, this "being sweet" thing.
Crankiness
Date: 2003-11-07 07:51 am (UTC)None of us is responsible for healing millenia of oppression, or last year's private (but actively nursed) insult. I wanted to stand up and yell something to the effect of, "The hell with your sacred wound. Disinfect that pus-filled thing and quit picking at it."
So sayeth the Pillar of Mercy. Grr.
no subject
Date: 2003-11-07 09:10 am (UTC)Y'all are so friendly and approachable..
Date: 2003-11-07 09:14 am (UTC)Anyway, seriously, you're doing a good job of running the meetings and coordinating this herd of diva cats. Trust me (get it...trust me?), your role as 'coordinator' is one of those things we trust you to do well, while reserving our collective right to be unamanageble, unruly, and unorganized. :/
Re: Y'all are so friendly and approachable..
And if you lot get to be unruly, etc. then I do too. So I guess I won't apologize for being rude at the meeting after all.
no subject
Date: 2003-11-07 09:50 am (UTC)Bunnies and goats, chicks and cubs...
But if you want, I'll pay less attention to you and more to your clothing. Better?
Re: Bunnies and goats, chicks and cubs...
Date: 2003-11-07 10:03 am (UTC)Only necessary for angora sweaters. The angora sweater as a concept is much more worthy of notice than I am. All hail the bunny.
Angora and Cashmere
Date: 2003-11-07 10:07 am (UTC)Angora and Cashmere and Mohair, oh my!
I take it all back; women do not have the clothing thing any easier, it's just a different circle of hell.
Done and done.
Date: 2003-11-07 10:52 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2003-11-07 10:53 am (UTC)Re: Done and done.
Date: 2003-11-07 10:58 am (UTC)(And you thought yesterday's comment threads were weird...)
Re: Angora and Cashmere and Mohair, oh my!
Date: 2003-11-07 11:31 am (UTC)Re: Angora and Cashmere and Mohair, oh my!
Date: 2003-11-07 11:48 am (UTC)