I'm amused that the answers for #1 trended toward the last two options at first, then the people with more impulse control logged in, and you've got 7 'Ummm...no' responses now. :)
Keeping in mind, I answered #1 as I thought I should ... recent past evidence to the contrary ignored.
#2 is an interesting concept. I find myself considering a similar idea for company parties and the like, where one might find you are currently lacking a partner or for political reasons you can't bring a "real" partner to said event ... having a pool of "escorts" for such events available. Veddy intrestin'.
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif){kind=small}
![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png){kind=small}
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
branchandroot
no subject
Date: 2008-02-26 09:30 pm (UTC)Also, #2 is very interesting.
no subject
Date: 2008-02-26 09:34 pm (UTC)low impulse control
Date: 2008-02-26 09:41 pm (UTC)[reload. reload. reload. ....]
no subject
Date: 2008-02-26 09:43 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-02-26 09:35 pm (UTC)#2 is an interesting concept. I find myself considering a similar idea for company parties and the like, where one might find you are currently lacking a partner or for political reasons you can't bring a "real" partner to said event ... having a pool of "escorts" for such events available. Veddy intrestin'.