Clearly, I've been falling down on my polling duties, since diermuid's including me in his polls. :) But today, today, we poll. CLICKY! (You know you want to.)
If you had put up a sign with some Asatruism, what would you like your Christian neighbors to do?
We're generally not supposed to wear costumes to work anymore... so of course I tend to. Oh, KILT!!!! Ha! Easier than armor. And arguably dress casual.
I actually had an odd thought, if I were to wear a kilt to the kid's school, and get stopped because someone felt it was inappropriate... they might ask if I was wearing something underneath. My thought is, I will turn the question around - do you ask every woman in a skirt if they are wearing panties or a slip? Or are you just personally vested in what's under MY outerwear?
If you had put up a sign with some Asatruism, what would you like your Christian neighbors to do? I wouldn't though, because I consider it bad manners to out your religious leanings in public without having been asked. (So I'm actually not going to do anything about the sign, I just thought it would be funny to think about it.)
Re: The kilt, I support it. Down with male fashion oppression! :)
I'm saving for the Mocker from Utilikilts, although it is dressier than what I normally wear. The standard one looks closer to my khakis.
I would probably end up ordering it about the time that we go to 'mobility' cubes (no assigned seats, work would be like an internet cafe). I figure the double entendre would be grand.
I tend to wear things under my overs just because it is good form... if I do not then I tend to have various immodesty issues. Although that can also happen if my undergarments are silk and it is a breezy day.
Depends on the school... the one I am at now seems quite open to culture. The one up at KCMO was kept conservative by a Roman Catholic principal who tried to educate kids in SPITE of their parent's diversity. Mik used to get into HUGE fights with the administration out there. (Ok, a normal thing for her, but that was one of her crusades that I agreed with her on.)
no subject
Date: 2007-10-19 06:06 pm (UTC)We're generally not supposed to wear costumes to work anymore... so of course I tend to. Oh, KILT!!!! Ha! Easier than armor. And arguably dress casual.
I actually had an odd thought, if I were to wear a kilt to the kid's school, and get stopped because someone felt it was inappropriate... they might ask if I was wearing something underneath. My thought is, I will turn the question around - do you ask every woman in a skirt if they are wearing panties or a slip? Or are you just personally vested in what's under MY outerwear?
no subject
Date: 2007-10-19 06:13 pm (UTC)I wouldn't though, because I consider it bad manners to out your religious leanings in public without having been asked. (So I'm actually not going to do anything about the sign, I just thought it would be funny to think about it.)
Re: The kilt, I support it. Down with male fashion oppression! :)
no subject
Date: 2007-10-19 06:22 pm (UTC)I would probably end up ordering it about the time that we go to 'mobility' cubes (no assigned seats, work would be like an internet cafe). I figure the double entendre would be grand.
no subject
Date: 2007-10-19 06:13 pm (UTC)Oh, that was a rhetorical question. My bad.
no subject
Date: 2007-10-19 06:28 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-10-19 07:47 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-10-25 06:33 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-10-19 06:21 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-10-19 06:26 pm (UTC)