(no subject)
Jun. 14th, 2006 12:48 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Susie Bright is making me kind of sad today. But only kind of. Here's the thing. If the motivating force behind the lack of libido she's talking about is people becoming estranged from their authentic desires due to stress, overwork, anxiety, chemical imbalance, etc., that's clearly no good. On the other hand, if the desire to have sex all the time was a cultural imposition on the authentic desires of these guys, then good for them that they can say "You know, I'm really more into _________." Or whatever. In general, I'm in favor of people knowing what they want, and admitting to what they want. It increases the odds that at some point they'll actually get what they want. (Unless, of course, what they want is to strip naked at work and roll in the blood of kittens, or whatnot, in which case admitting to what they want makes it more likely they'll get counselling. Which could be okay too.)
So in my usual not particularly scientific but curious manner, I want to know what you guys want. Indulge me, would you?
[Poll #747979]
Also, new icon.
So in my usual not particularly scientific but curious manner, I want to know what you guys want. Indulge me, would you?
[Poll #747979]
Also, new icon.
no subject
Date: 2006-06-14 06:05 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-06-14 06:11 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-06-14 06:16 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-06-14 06:07 pm (UTC)Sometimes, life is good.
no subject
Date: 2006-06-14 06:11 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-06-14 06:17 pm (UTC)So, sex.
no subject
Date: 2006-06-14 06:28 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-06-14 06:30 pm (UTC)You know what I really want, above all of those, sounds too much like a girly-thing to admit publicly ...
no subject
Date: 2006-06-14 06:30 pm (UTC)But if I actually saw the person, or smelled them, well that would probably change my answer.
I like the new icon.
no subject
Date: 2006-06-14 07:18 pm (UTC)Well, until I saw the $20.
But I decided that the meal would be better in the long run.
no subject
Date: 2006-06-14 08:12 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-06-14 08:13 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-06-14 08:30 pm (UTC)However, on a more general level, I think I would choose #1 about 40-50% of the time. I'm older than I used to be, you see, and my stamina is waning. Plus, a man can survive longer without sex than he can without food or sleep.
Now 20 out of 33...
Date: 2006-06-15 12:03 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-06-15 02:32 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-06-15 02:36 am (UTC)Honestly, my anatomy keeps me from having sex quite as much as I'd like. Our smallest cat is Chantilly Lace, otherwise generally known as Tilly. (I promise, this'll get relevant in a moment.) She's like half the size of any of the other cats in the house, and she talks. Or rather, bitches. All the time. She loves loves loves attention, but will complain about it the entire time. And then complain more when you stop.
We realized the other day that she and my snatch have a lot in common.
(Via, if you're reading this, stop reading now.)
And Joel is freakin' huge. Ow. I pretty much have to be in a masochistic mood to get into penetration with him.
Anyway.
I want them all.
Date: 2006-06-15 03:21 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-06-15 04:07 am (UTC)