![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
Oct. 21st, 2005
Now that's what we like to hear.
Oct. 21st, 2005 12:39 pmA cookie for the Kansas Supreme Court, who today ruled that you can't punish same-sex underage sexual activity if you're not gonna punish different-sex underage sexual activity to the same degree..
Says the court, "Moral disapproval of a group cannot be a legitimate state interest."
Being somewhat past the age where laws against underage sexual activity apply to me, I'm more interested in the statement than in the ruling, but hey. Even in Kansas, they're beginning to think maybe this sort of thing isn't quite fair.
Says the court, "Moral disapproval of a group cannot be a legitimate state interest."
Being somewhat past the age where laws against underage sexual activity apply to me, I'm more interested in the statement than in the ruling, but hey. Even in Kansas, they're beginning to think maybe this sort of thing isn't quite fair.
Now that's what we like to hear.
Oct. 21st, 2005 12:39 pmA cookie for the Kansas Supreme Court, who today ruled that you can't punish same-sex underage sexual activity if you're not gonna punish different-sex underage sexual activity to the same degree..
Says the court, "Moral disapproval of a group cannot be a legitimate state interest."
Being somewhat past the age where laws against underage sexual activity apply to me, I'm more interested in the statement than in the ruling, but hey. Even in Kansas, they're beginning to think maybe this sort of thing isn't quite fair.
Says the court, "Moral disapproval of a group cannot be a legitimate state interest."
Being somewhat past the age where laws against underage sexual activity apply to me, I'm more interested in the statement than in the ruling, but hey. Even in Kansas, they're beginning to think maybe this sort of thing isn't quite fair.