A Bear, and Pascal's Wager
Mar. 9th, 2006 04:28 pmThe other day, I had a dream in which I was being chased by a bear. I often talk about dreams in terms of being chased by a bear (which I must have learned from some television show), as in "You had a bad dream? Were you being chased by a bear?", but to my knowledge, this is the only time that I have ever actually dreamed of being chased by a bear.
In the dream, I was back in college, in my Philosophy class. I was arguing with the professor about Pascal's wager. Now, for context, I really did have a philosophy class, in which I really did argue with the prof about this, and got roundly ignored for it. But here, in the dream, I had much better arguments than I had in real life. But anyway.
sky_pilott came in and informed us that there was a giant bear ravaging the campus, and that the best thing for it would be to run for our lives. And so we did. And there was, in fact, a giant bear. When I say giant, I don't mean giant like a real grizzly bear is giant. I mean giant like a bear in a kaiju film would be, if they ever made kaiju films about bears. It was rending the buildings and shaking students into its maw. This was, of course, when I woke up.
And I was thinking, how is the thing with the bear any different from Pascal's wager? I was told that there was a bear, and that if I didn't react in the appropriate way, I would suffer for it. Bear + running = fine, no bear + running = fine, no bear + no running = fine, bear + no running = dead. And I was perfectly willing to run from this reported bear, on no more evidence than
sky_pilott's say-so. Now, I do consider
sky_pilott to be a generally reliable source, so that's something. And yet, I reject the idea that I should believe in a deity based on someone's say-so, because I fear that if I don't, then something bad will happen to me. I suppose that I'm perfectly willing to have a fear-based relationship with giant bears, but not with gods. Or something.
In the dream, I was back in college, in my Philosophy class. I was arguing with the professor about Pascal's wager. Now, for context, I really did have a philosophy class, in which I really did argue with the prof about this, and got roundly ignored for it. But here, in the dream, I had much better arguments than I had in real life. But anyway.
And I was thinking, how is the thing with the bear any different from Pascal's wager? I was told that there was a bear, and that if I didn't react in the appropriate way, I would suffer for it. Bear + running = fine, no bear + running = fine, no bear + no running = fine, bear + no running = dead. And I was perfectly willing to run from this reported bear, on no more evidence than