Non-attachment, non-disinterest
May. 24th, 2004 09:03 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
featherynscaleIf you'll notice, you haven't seen the "if you can't stop thinking about someone" behavior-unit show up in my journal. This doesn't mean I'm not thinking about you. It just means that I can stop, whenever I want, and do from time to time, just to keep in practice.
That said, today I'm missing![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)
matchgirl42, Emperor Kristoff, Dan the Abbot of Lesbians, and especially Daven (but I'm glad he's stateside these days). Those are my far-offs, but I'm also missing some of the near-and-dear crowd. They know who they are.
Incidentally,
From Go-Quiz.com
So yeah. Non-attachment, non-disinterest means that there are outcomes you'd prefer, but that you're still flexible enough to accept it and move on with your life if it doesn't work that way. I'm reading a very interesting short book on game theory these days, which focuses on the difference between games you play to win, and games you play to play. I think I'm going to give it tosaffronhare when I'm done. It ties in well to the magician's meta-model - in its terms, we're playing a series of finite games (the sort you play to win) within an infinite game (the sort you play to play)... Torn between going, "Well, duh", and not being able to wrap my head around it properly. Film at 11.
That said, today I'm missing
matchgirl42, Emperor Kristoff, Dan the Abbot of Lesbians, and especially Daven (but I'm glad he's stateside these days). Those are my far-offs, but I'm also missing some of the near-and-dear crowd. They know who they are. Incidentally,
| THIS WAY UP � |
| featherynscale has fragile contents which may break! |
From Go-Quiz.com
So yeah. Non-attachment, non-disinterest means that there are outcomes you'd prefer, but that you're still flexible enough to accept it and move on with your life if it doesn't work that way. I'm reading a very interesting short book on game theory these days, which focuses on the difference between games you play to win, and games you play to play. I think I'm going to give it to
saffronhare when I'm done. It ties in well to the magician's meta-model - in its terms, we're playing a series of finite games (the sort you play to win) within an infinite game (the sort you play to play)... Torn between going, "Well, duh", and not being able to wrap my head around it properly. Film at 11.
![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png){kind=small}
no subject
Date: 2004-05-24 08:07 pm (UTC)If I may ask
Date: 2004-05-24 08:48 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-05-25 02:14 am (UTC)Non-attachment, non-disinterest
I'd be more inclined to say
Date: 2004-05-25 06:15 am (UTC)Re: If I may ask
Date: 2004-05-25 06:20 am (UTC)For the record
Date: 2004-05-25 06:25 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-05-25 06:26 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-05-25 07:33 am (UTC)Re: I'd be more inclined to say
Date: 2004-05-25 09:46 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-05-25 10:15 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-05-25 10:16 am (UTC)a bit late,but....
Date: 2004-07-14 02:40 am (UTC)I miss you too !!!!
*sniff, sniff*