Happiness is....

[featherynscale]

...knowing that the folks in the adversarial camp don't understand the nature of online polling. Remember that gay marriage poll we hijacked from the membership of the American Family Association? Well, guess what kids? We're all on their mailing list now :-D

And you know what that means. . .


Other polls, presumably more correct in their statistical sampling methods, are showing things to be pleased about here.

Comments

[chronarchy.livejournal.com]

That is good news. If you can get all those women to get out and vote.

[featherynscale.livejournal.com]

Yup. It's always about who shows up.

Wonder if the dems will take a non-dem volunteer to drive the bus? :-P

[chronarchy.livejournal.com]

In my experience, the Dems (much like the Republicans) will do *anything* they have to in order to win.

I don't think they'll squabble too much if you make it clear that you intend to help.

But woe to you if you get lost while driving them to the polls! They'll know you're a Republican stooge for sure, and you'll be ripped to shreds in no time!

[featherynscale.livejournal.com]

No elephant I. Lost, though, a lot. :)
Just one lone green, driving the bus.

[chronarchy.livejournal.com]

I can hear the Dems now, sitting on the bus, shaking their fist at you as you try to get them to their polls:

"Damn Greens! Always taking votes away from the Democrats! Just like the last election!"

Sometimes I wonder if who the Dems hate more: Bush for winning, or Nader for losing. . .

[featherynscale.livejournal.com]

Yup. Two-party bastardy. In my world, if the Dems had been paying more attention to the folks on the left, who should also be their constituents if you're only looking at the two major parties, then Nader wouldn't have been an issue.

I mean, if you're going to run things as if the Republicans automatically get the whole right wing, and you're going to fight them for the center, and ignore the whole left wing, you shouldn't complain when the left wing doesn't vote for you.