featherynscale (
featherynscale) wrote2006-11-16 03:14 pm
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Entry tags:
Porn!
After reading some pretty intense stuff on the flist about people's pornography addictions and the other associated evils of porn today, I am left with a single stupid question that is completely out of place in the original thread:
Why doesn't anybody ever complain that porn objectifies/degrades/devalues men? (I mean, provided that there are men in the porn. Obviously, lesbian porn doesn't objectify men, but, you know.)
(Also, can you tell it's a slow day? I can.)
Why doesn't anybody ever complain that porn objectifies/degrades/devalues men? (I mean, provided that there are men in the porn. Obviously, lesbian porn doesn't objectify men, but, you know.)
(Also, can you tell it's a slow day? I can.)
no subject
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
(no subject)
Now's your chance!
Re: Now's your chance!
Re: Now's your chance!
no subject
no subject
If the fucking Dworkinite twits would look at the assumptions that fuel their invective against porn, they'd see hoe circular their logic is and how all their theories created to 'free' women from male dominance are actually reinforcing feminine victim mentality.
::seethes::
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
(no subject)
no subject
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
(no subject)
unrealted